🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.